http://gizmodo.com/5886013/hunters-shoo ... of-the-sky

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
If they animal-nazis were flying it onto private property?gigag04 wrote:If that thing was over $1500 they just committed a felony....so....
I'm just going to guess that they meant dove but the reporters fumbled it. Pigeons are actually the rock dove.Heartland Patriot wrote:Did anyone else find it kind of odd that the animal rights activists thought the hunting club folks were shooting "pigeons"? Is that a big thing in South Carolina? Or is it more likely that they were shooting "clay pigeons"? Maybe I'M the one who's missing something here, please explain if I am. I hunted dove and quail as a kid, and I had a couple of young troops that worked for me in California who were really into duck hunting, but pigeons, real live, rats-with-wings, splatter-your-car pigeons? That is a new on on me.
gigag04 wrote:If that thing was over $1500 they just committed a felony....so....
http://thetandd.com/animal-rights-group ... 3ce6c.htmlHindi estimated damage to the drone at around $200 to $300
If it's on their property? How does that work? Curious.gigag04 wrote:If that thing was over $1500 they just committed a felony....so....
"He claimed the shooters were "in tree cover"
There's a few Game wardens I need to get in touch with!RPB wrote: Parks and Wildlife Code. Title 5. Wildlife and Plant Conservation. Subtitle B. Hunting and Fishing. Chapter 62. Provisions Generally Applicable to Hunting. Subchapter A. General Provisions. § 62.0125. Harassment of Hunters, Trappers, and Fishermen
from "AnimalLaw.info"![]()
http://www.animallaw.info/statutes/stus ... 2_0125.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sportsman's Rights Act.