

Moderator: carlson1


Is that better?G26ster wrote:Nice pistol. It would be nice if you would re-size your photos before posting. It would much easier to see the whole image. These images are 2,048 × 1,536. Thanks.
 I usually use my cell phone camera, this is my first point and shoot and I'm not used to have like a billion megapixels
   I usually use my cell phone camera, this is my first point and shoot and I'm not used to have like a billion megapixels 
Much better, IMHO!!!!kevin wrote:Is that better?G26ster wrote:Nice pistol. It would be nice if you would re-size your photos before posting. It would much easier to see the whole image. These images are 2,048 × 1,536. Thanks.I usually use my cell phone camera, this is my first point and shoot and I'm not used to have like a billion megapixels


AndyC wrote:show the groups :)


If thats the case, Rock River is putting out one. I am tempted as I think highly of RRA.carlson1 wrote:Good job. I always wanted to try the 1911 in ploymer.


this gun is "old"psijac wrote:Kimberly just won't give up on the external extractor thing
 They gave it up years back, although not sure why they couldn't get any where with it?  S&W and Sig do just fine with their externals on their 1911's.
    They gave it up years back, although not sure why they couldn't get any where with it?  S&W and Sig do just fine with their externals on their 1911's.Whoa -- TAM changed his avatar. He'd been using that last one so long, I thought it was aging with himThe Annoyed Man wrote:So Kevin, how fat is this thing in the hand compared to M&P, XD, XDm, and Glock .45s?
