Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

barstoolguru
Senior Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 8:38 am
Location: under a rock in area 51

Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by barstoolguru »

A California appeals court has reinstated a lawsuit against gun maker Glock Inc. by a police officer paralyzed after his 3-year-old son accidentally shot him
this guy is carless with his firearm and he thinks it someone else’s fault....and he is a LEO. he should be charged with child endangerment for the kid having access to the gun

http://www.policeone.com/legal/articles ... sue-Glock/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Some parents say it is toy guns that make boys warlike. But give a boy a rubber duck and he will seize its neck like the butt of a pistol and shout "Bang!"......George Will
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by RPB »

after his 3-year-old son accidentally shot him
might have been on purpose ...

Dad, let's stop for ice cream ... NO ....


but yeah, these type things happen when a parent fails to fill a barrel with Sakrete Mortar mix and allow it to harden overnight so a round can't be chambered in case a 3-year-old gets to crying over spilled milk or cookie jar access denial and dad hands him a gun instead of a pacifier
shot in the back in 2006 while driving. His son had found the gun while riding in the back seat of the vehicle,
light trigger pull (Parent didn't install that New York Trigger huh?) lack of grip Safety .....like those revolvers have .... sheesh

If Parent wanted a Glock with a grip safety (and thumb safety on some models) shouldda bought an XD My XD45 has both a grip and thumb safety, and the main one located inside the trigger guard.


I can see it now, every car owner involved in any wreck who lost control should sue manufacturers for failing to have stabilizing tail fins like Cadillac used to or that air foil like them Porsche's have... ... when they just bought the wrong car if that's what they wanted...
Last edited by RPB on Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by E.Marquez »

Chavez was shot in the back in 2006 while driving. His son had found the gun while riding in the back seat of the vehicle, the newspaper said.
Firearms must be kept locked up when children may be present. The 2008 California Dangerous Weapons Control Law modified California Penal Code section 12035 defining criminal storage of a firearm as keeping "any loaded firearm within any premises that are under his or her custody or control and he or she knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm." A person may be charged with a crime, if he or she keeps a loaded firearm, and the child takes the firearm to a public place or causes injury
Why was this criminal Mr Chavez not charged and tried for his crime under CA law?
California Penal Code section 12035 http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/4/2/1/2/s12035" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by RPB »

bronco78 wrote:
Chavez was shot in the back in 2006 while driving. His son had found the gun while riding in the back seat of the vehicle, the newspaper said.
Firearms must be kept locked up when children may be present. The 2008 California Dangerous Weapons Control Law modified California Penal Code section 12035 defining criminal storage of a firearm as keeping "any loaded firearm within any premises that are under his or her custody or control and he or she knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm." A person may be charged with a crime, if he or she keeps a loaded firearm, and the child takes the firearm to a public place or causes injury
Why was this criminal Mr Chavez not charged and tried for his crime under CA law?
California Penal Code section 12035 http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/4/2/1/2/s12035" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:iagree:
I'm guessing they wanted MediCal to pay his medical bills instead of the Prison System.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
Texas Dan Mosby
Senior Member
Posts: 730
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:54 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by Texas Dan Mosby »

Good, good.

This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.

Image
88 day wait for the state to approve my constitutional right to bear arms...
User avatar
i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by i8godzilla »

Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Good, good.

This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.

Image

Me too! Just think a couple more of us and we can qualify for a Class Action!
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by RPB »

my first knife was a folder without a lockblade safety, it folded up on my fingers while stabbing an imaginary alligator or crocodile like Tarzan did ( I swam out in the grassy front yard and stabbed at a stick)
Statute of Limitations ran already though still have the scar ... all folding knives need lockblade safeties in case someone watches Tarzan

I am glad that the system exists so that pen caps and marker caps have holes to avoid kids strangling on them, but people also need to be responsible for themselves
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
barstoolguru
Senior Member
Posts: 526
Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 8:38 am
Location: under a rock in area 51

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by barstoolguru »

i8godzilla wrote:
Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Good, good.

This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.

Image

Me too! Just think a couple more of us and we can qualify for a Class Action!
buy a garlic press and save your fingers
Some parents say it is toy guns that make boys warlike. But give a boy a rubber duck and he will seize its neck like the butt of a pistol and shout "Bang!"......George Will
Dave2
Senior Member
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by Dave2 »

barstoolguru wrote:
i8godzilla wrote:
Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Good, good.

This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.

Image

Me too! Just think a couple more of us and we can qualify for a Class Action!
buy a garlic press and save your fingers
Why? I don't want to risk crushing my fingers. GARLIC PRESSES ARE UNSAFE!!!!!!
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
riatta
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:20 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by riatta »

bronco78 wrote:
Chavez was shot in the back in 2006 while driving. His son had found the gun while riding in the back seat of the vehicle, the newspaper said.
Firearms must be kept locked up when children may be present. The 2008 California Dangerous Weapons Control Law modified California Penal Code section 12035 defining criminal storage of a firearm as keeping "any loaded firearm within any premises that are under his or her custody or control and he or she knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm." A person may be charged with a crime, if he or she keeps a loaded firearm, and the child takes the firearm to a public place or causes injury
Why was this criminal Mr Chavez not charged and tried for his crime under CA law?
California Penal Code section 12035 http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/4/2/1/2/s12035" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If the event happened in 2006 and law passed in 2008 , you cant charge someone with a crime if the law didn't exist at the time. I would think he should have been charged with child endangerment. if it was a civilian he probably would have.
User avatar
E.Marquez
Senior Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Kempner
Contact:

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by E.Marquez »

riatta wrote:
bronco78 wrote:
Chavez was shot in the back in 2006 while driving. His son had found the gun while riding in the back seat of the vehicle, the newspaper said.
Firearms must be kept locked up when children may be present. The 2008 California Dangerous Weapons Control Law modified California Penal Code section 12035 defining criminal storage of a firearm as keeping "any loaded firearm within any premises that are under his or her custody or control and he or she knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm." A person may be charged with a crime, if he or she keeps a loaded firearm, and the child takes the firearm to a public place or causes injury
Why was this criminal Mr Chavez not charged and tried for his crime under CA law?
California Penal Code section 12035 http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/4/2/1/2/s12035" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If the event happened in 2006 and law passed in 2008 , you cant charge someone with a crime if the law didn't exist at the time. I would think he should have been charged with child endangerment. if it was a civilian he probably would have.

Well sure you can....since when do prosecutors have to follow the rules written for us? :biggrinjester:


Much like a LEO can write a citation for pretty much anything they “think” is a violation of the law. Though the DA or judge may very well disagree, it does not mean you will not be cited.

You are of course correct, Im not sure what the law said before it was changed in 2008..
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
chamuiel
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:52 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by chamuiel »

bronco78 wrote:
Chavez was shot in the back in 2006 while driving. His son had found the gun while riding in the back seat of the vehicle, the newspaper said.
Firearms must be kept locked up when children may be present. The 2008 California Dangerous Weapons Control Law modified California Penal Code section 12035 defining criminal storage of a firearm as keeping "any loaded firearm within any premises that are under his or her custody or control and he or she knows or reasonably should know that a child is likely to gain access to the firearm." A person may be charged with a crime, if he or she keeps a loaded firearm, and the child takes the firearm to a public place or causes injury
Why was this criminal Mr Chavez not charged and tried for his crime under CA law?
California Penal Code section 12035 http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/4/2/1/2/s12035" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:eek6

1: Chavez was a LEO.
2: The law clearly states "May be", it does not state "Will be". :eek6
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13577
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by C-dub »

Who else was he going to sue? Himself? His son? Gotta sue someone. I am, however, surprised the judge is allowing it to proceed. He's obviously a moron. Doesn't mean he'll win. The guy really has a slim to nothing chance of winning and Slim has left the building. That issue has already been hashed out and even if some lunatic liberal judge finds Glock culpable it'll get overturned on appeal just like Obamacare. Uh, well, nevermind ... :leaving
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
Deltaboy
Senior Member
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Johnson County TX

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by Deltaboy »

Sad to hear the LEO didn't secure his Duty weapon properly. Shame on the Judge! The Judge should have told him Tough and you paying for your mistake. :txflag:
I 'm just an Ole Sinner saved by Grace and Smith & Wesson.
Katygunnut
Senior Member
Posts: 710
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 9:34 pm

Re: Judge allows paralyzed cop to sue Glock

Post by Katygunnut »

Texas Dan Mosby wrote:Good, good.

This gives me hope for my $93,000,000,000.82 suit against Henckel for that nasty cut I suffered while chopping garlic due to their unsafe product.

Image

Wow, there doesn't appear to be any safety, and it looks like it also takes an extremely low amount of pressure to make that thing cut. I can't believe we allow something like that on the market.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”