Canada tried long gun registration - and gave up

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Canada tried long gun registration - and gave up

Post by baldeagle »

http://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfishe ... d-gave-up/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The bigger lesson of Canada’s experiment, Mauser says, is that gun registration rarely delivers the results proponents expect. In most countries the actual number registered settles out at about a sixth. Germany required registration during the Baader-Meinhof reign of terror in the 1970s, and recorded 3.2 million of the estimated 17 million guns in that country; England tried to register pump-action and semiautomatic shotguns in the 1980s, but only got about 50,000 of the estimated 300,000 such guns stored in homes around the country
Wouldn't it be safe to assume that the results in the US would be even less successful?
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
Andrew

Re: Canada tried long gun registration - and gave up

Post by Andrew »

As proven in many studies, gun ownership has nothing to do with crime rates. So registration has but 2 purposes, Taxation or Confiscation. No thinking person could believe that registration provides any value to law enforcement.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”