What happened to minding one's own business?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Just for clarity, the rescue was made by CA Air National Guard parachutists who rescued the girl from the sailboat, stabilized her, and next day placed her on board a US Navy ship that was already enroute to San Diego. I don't believe the Coast Guard was involved, other than receiving the distress call, as the rescue was made 900 miles off the coast of Mexico.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/07/pa ... vy-rescue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/07/pa ... vy-rescue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Dragonfighter
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Okay, let me try this.G26ster wrote:Just for clarity, the rescue was made by CA Air National Guard parachutists who rescued the girl from the sailboat, stabilized her, and next day placed her on board a US Navy ship that was already enroute to San Diego. I don't believe the Coast Guard was involved, other than receiving the distress call, as the rescue was made 900 miles off the coast of Mexico.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/07/pa ... vy-rescue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am glad the little girl is safe, I am glad the Coasties received the call, I'm glad that th CA national Guard rescued her and I am glad to support the Navy my tax dollars.

I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
- Location: Cedar Park Texas
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
And that Nanny State comes from both sides. Politicians of all stripes get elected on nanny state agendas.BigGuy wrote:What happened to minding one's own business?
Those of us who believe in it do. Those who don't are busy creating a nanny State.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
- Location: Cedar Park Texas
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Dragonfighter has the way of it.Dragonfighter wrote:Okay, let me try this.G26ster wrote:Just for clarity, the rescue was made by CA Air National Guard parachutists who rescued the girl from the sailboat, stabilized her, and next day placed her on board a US Navy ship that was already enroute to San Diego. I don't believe the Coast Guard was involved, other than receiving the distress call, as the rescue was made 900 miles off the coast of Mexico.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/07/pa ... vy-rescue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am glad the little girl is safe, I am glad the Coasties received the call, I'm glad that th CA national Guard rescued her and I am glad to support the Navy my tax dollars.
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
The nanny state is the product of the Democrat Party. It began with Johnson's Great Society garbage and it has grown primarily through the support of Democrats. Yes, some Republicans have helped, but largely because the voters in their districts have become so addicted to government handout and regulation that at least some support was necessary to get elected. The vast majority of Republicans do not support the nanny state concept. There's a big difference between supporting bigger government (which I oppose) and supporting liberal/Democrat nanny state laws and policies.Cedar Park Dad wrote:And that Nanny State comes from both sides. Politicians of all stripes get elected on nanny state agendas.BigGuy wrote:What happened to minding one's own business?
Those of us who believe in it do. Those who don't are busy creating a nanny State.
Chas.
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
I wasn't weighing in on the legality or morality of who should pay. The purpose of my post was to give credit where credit was due for the rescue.Cedar Park Dad wrote:Dragonfighter has the way of it.Dragonfighter wrote:Okay, let me try this.G26ster wrote:Just for clarity, the rescue was made by CA Air National Guard parachutists who rescued the girl from the sailboat, stabilized her, and next day placed her on board a US Navy ship that was already enroute to San Diego. I don't believe the Coast Guard was involved, other than receiving the distress call, as the rescue was made 900 miles off the coast of Mexico.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/04/07/pa ... vy-rescue/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am glad the little girl is safe, I am glad the Coasties received the call, I'm glad that th CA national Guard rescued her and I am glad to support the Navy my tax dollars.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
- Location: Cedar Park Texas
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Drug laws (we'll get tough on crime) and other laws about personal behavior - pornography, etc.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The nanny state is the product of the Democrat Party. It began with Johnson's Great Society garbage and it has grown primarily through the support of Democrats. Yes, some Republicans have helped, but largely because the voters in their districts have become so addicted to government handout and regulation that at least some support was necessary to get elected. The vast majority of Republicans do not support the nanny state concept. There's a big difference between supporting bigger government (which I oppose) and supporting liberal/Democrat nanny state laws and policies.Cedar Park Dad wrote:And that Nanny State comes from both sides. Politicians of all stripes get elected on nanny state agendas.BigGuy wrote:What happened to minding one's own business?
Those of us who believe in it do. Those who don't are busy creating a nanny State.
Chas.
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Apparently our definition of "nanny state" is vastly different.Cedar Park Dad wrote:Drug laws (we'll get tough on crime) and other laws about personal behavior - pornography, etc.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The nanny state is the product of the Democrat Party. It began with Johnson's Great Society garbage and it has grown primarily through the support of Democrats. Yes, some Republicans have helped, but largely because the voters in their districts have become so addicted to government handout and regulation that at least some support was necessary to get elected. The vast majority of Republicans do not support the nanny state concept. There's a big difference between supporting bigger government (which I oppose) and supporting liberal/Democrat nanny state laws and policies.Cedar Park Dad wrote:And that Nanny State comes from both sides. Politicians of all stripes get elected on nanny state agendas.BigGuy wrote:What happened to minding one's own business?
Those of us who believe in it do. Those who don't are busy creating a nanny State.
Chas.
Chas.
- Dragonfighter
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
I know, I was just being a smart alec. It really was good information but too little sleep and too much coffee...G26ster wrote: I wasn't weighing in on the legality or morality of who should pay. The purpose of my post was to give credit where credit was due for the rescue.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
-
- Banned
- Posts: 2064
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
- Location: Cedar Park Texas
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
And thats allright. The older I get (read more crotchety) the more hostile to any government intrusion I get.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Apparently our definition of "nanny state" is vastly different.Cedar Park Dad wrote:Drug laws (we'll get tough on crime) and other laws about personal behavior - pornography, etc.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The nanny state is the product of the Democrat Party. It began with Johnson's Great Society garbage and it has grown primarily through the support of Democrats. Yes, some Republicans have helped, but largely because the voters in their districts have become so addicted to government handout and regulation that at least some support was necessary to get elected. The vast majority of Republicans do not support the nanny state concept. There's a big difference between supporting bigger government (which I oppose) and supporting liberal/Democrat nanny state laws and policies.Cedar Park Dad wrote:And that Nanny State comes from both sides. Politicians of all stripes get elected on nanny state agendas.BigGuy wrote:What happened to minding one's own business?
Those of us who believe in it do. Those who don't are busy creating a nanny State.
Chas.
Chas.
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
It seems to be a mixed bag when it comes to counties requiring reimbursement of rescue costs. Where I go in the Rockies, reimbursement is required, and I am for the practice. Skiers go into off-limits avalanche areas and require rescue. Seems to me they should pay. As for the ocean, how can it be determined that those rescued were foolhardy? If a good system for doing so can be devised, I would be for it. Tradition isn’t always the correct path.
TX CHL 1997
- Charles L. Cotton
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17788
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
I don't get involved with political issues unrelated to the Second Amendment and use of force because doing so would lessen my effectiveness. However, if I could, I would lobby for a few other causes and issues and one would be to pass a law prohibiting any "user fees" for any service provided by an entity with taxing authority. In my opinion, the fees for ambulance, fire protection, police protection, building permits, city inspectors, municipal bus/train service, and everything else a taxing authority does are prepaid via by taxes. (There should be no toll roads after the cost of construction is recouped.)rdcrags wrote:It seems to be a mixed bag when it comes to counties requiring reimbursement of rescue costs. Where I go in the Rockies, reimbursement is required, and I am for the practice. Skiers go into off-limits avalanche areas and require rescue. Seems to me they should pay. As for the ocean, how can it be determined that those rescued were foolhardy? If a good system for doing so can be devised, I would be for it. Tradition isn’t always the correct path.
Chas.
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Charles L. Cotton wrote:I don't get involved with political issues unrelated to the Second Amendment and use of force because doing so would lessen my effectiveness. However, if I could, I would lobby for a few other causes and issues and one would be to pass a law prohibiting any "user fees" for any service provided by an entity with taxing authority. In my opinion, the fees for ambulance, fire protection, police protection, building permits, city inspectors, municipal bus/train service, and everything else a taxing authority does are prepaid via by taxes. (There should be no toll roads after the cost of construction is recouped.)rdcrags wrote:It seems to be a mixed bag when it comes to counties requiring reimbursement of rescue costs. Where I go in the Rockies, reimbursement is required, and I am for the practice. Skiers go into off-limits avalanche areas and require rescue. Seems to me they should pay. As for the ocean, how can it be determined that those rescued were foolhardy? If a good system for doing so can be devised, I would be for it. Tradition isn’t always the correct path.
Chas.

"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
- NavyVet1959
- Member
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:18 pm
- Location: Texas, ya'll
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
The question becomes "why keep flying the aircraft for 6 more hours when the ocean underneath him was perfectly good for crashing into?" Was this just a case of a pilot that wanted to commit suicide or was this a more elaborate terrorist plot involving gps spoofing, an aviation transceiver, and someone pretending to be ATC? If the black boxes show nothing, I suspect that there might be a push for longer recordings for them.
- CoolBreeze
- Senior Member
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:59 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: What happened to minding one's own business?
Unfortunately so true...Redneck_Buddha wrote:Ooooohhhh I'm gonna have to borrow that!VMI77 wrote:It's the progressive way. A million little busy bodies are a million little spies. After all, you can't spell progressive without the "SS."
The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent in the people; that... it is their right and duty to be at all times armed. -Thomas Jefferson
Never Shoot a Large Caliber Man with a Small Caliber Bullet
IANAL - Please do not assume anything in my posts is legal advice
Never Shoot a Large Caliber Man with a Small Caliber Bullet
IANAL - Please do not assume anything in my posts is legal advice