This statement irks me to no end. Only murderers make the decision to shoot someone to death. This officer made the decision to shoot, no doubt, but I doubt seriously that he intended to kill the suspect. All officers are trained, as are CHL holders, to shoot for center mass to stop the threat. It should never be our intent to kill. In fact, head shots are thought to be iffy at best because they are so often fatal. A CHL holder who shot someone in the head instead of the chest could very well go to trial for murder and the self defense claim would be strongly questioned.In an effort to protect this obviously disturbed man from causing himself, or anyone else, any further harm, Flores made the decision to shoot him to death while he was handcuffed.
Due to media ignorance, we often see things like this or someone questioning why an officer didn't shoot someone in the leg to stop them from advancing. It irritates me to no end that the media never presents factual information and instead publishes emotional appeals to drive readers' opinions.
There, I've vented.