





Of course I just clean it out, bang around for a minute and go tell her its now "fixed".

She, of course, is extremely grateful to have married such a handy guy....



Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
No seals on top loaders, just on front loaders, and the open tops let ari circulate, which cuts down on the chance of smelly.Abraham wrote:Jim,
Great information!
I've an LG top load, H.E. washing machine. I've looked and don't see anything resembling a seal.
Perhaps, you can point out where to look for the seals...?
Thanks!
Might be a legal/liability reason for that: Supreme Court Sends Smelly Washer Case Back For Another Lookjimlongley wrote: ...
... and when I went through my initial training, EVERY, without exception, manufacturer rep stood in front of the class and dogmatically expounded that THEIR washers did not need to have the doors left open because their machines didn't get smelly.
"Your Honor, we the plaintiff's lawyers call to the stand noted washer expert witness Jim Longley..."jimlongley wrote: ...
Without exception, they were ALL wrong. At this point I have seen at least 3 generations of Maytag and (by extension Whirlpool, same company) washers go by, and 5 of LG, with upgrades in every generation and some of those upgrades aimed at preventing smelly.
When the legal sharks are in the water, best not to do a lot of splashing around...run silent, run deep...jimlongley wrote: ...
All of those manufacturers have quietly set up their machines to do that or something like it these days. ...to allow you to leave the door slightly open ...
But, from the article linked above:jimlongley wrote: ... - Maytag and Whirlpool say "Clean Washer with Affresh" and gues who makes Affresh, ... Samsung shot themselves in the foot a couple of years ago, they came up with a great idea, using hot water and pressure to clean their washers without chemicals, and they called it "Pure Cycle."
Maybe Samsung wasn't the one shooting itself in the foot.[Plaintiff's attorney] Selbin said one of the strongest elements in their case is that Whirlpool has essentially admitted its washers have a problem by instructing users to apply a treatment called Affresh once a month to cut down on odors in its front-loading machines. Consumers only learn this after they buy the unit and it adds $300 to the lifetime cost of operating the washer, Selbin said. He wants a class action to determine whether Whirlpool has liability for that $300, times millions of front-loader consumers.
MY customers know about it long before they purchase the machine, explain both cleaning the machine the way the manufacturers recommend, and the alternatives, such as white vinegar and other stuff found on the internet. I expound on it as one of the differences between HE FL and TL machines, including the fact that the TL machines include a clean washer cycle because they are using HE detergent which generates a lot of soap scum, and they could potentially, although less so, get smelly.ELB wrote: . . .
But, from the article linked above:Maybe Samsung wasn't the one shooting itself in the foot.[Plaintiff's attorney] Selbin said one of the strongest elements in their case is that Whirlpool has essentially admitted its washers have a problem by instructing users to apply a treatment called Affresh once a month to cut down on odors in its front-loading machines. Consumers only learn this after they buy the unit and it adds $300 to the lifetime cost of operating the washer, Selbin said. He wants a class action to determine whether Whirlpool has liability for that $300, times millions of front-loader consumers.
Nice to know. Looks like a call to the repair folks is in order.jimlongley wrote:
...
1, the washer is delivered to the customer and set up by the delivery people, and they remove the shipping bolts and neglect, for whatever reason, to leave them with the customer, or they do leave them with the customer who immediately forgets where they are and what they are for; which may lead to the customer making the error of moving the washer, at some later date, without the important shipping bolts, leading to damage to the suspension system with a resultant dancing.
2, the customer having retained the shipping bolts and remembering what they are for, places the bolts before moving the machine (EVEN to put a pedestal under it) and then forgets to remove the bolts from the machine after leveling it up, and the machine dances because the vibration prevention and compensation system can't do their job.