Fair enough, how about BIG ammo-buster or 30.05 notice as specified in my original post?Keith B wrote:A CHL does not get out of a 30.05 just for being a CHL. However, we DO get the exemption if the soul reason for the tresspassing charge was because you're were carrying concealed with a license. The 30.05 charge would only be applicable as a Class C misdemanor at most. As for a 'no ammo' sign, a 5 point sign would not be valid per 30.05 as they must be noticiable.

I tend to agree but...I think we would still get the exemption as the intent of the posting would be to try and prohibit concealed carry and it would be clear that was their goal and we would have the defense to prosecution.
There's no CASE LAW?
Are you willing to be the TEST CASE?
Risk TAKING THE RIDE?
Have only a DEFENSE?
What about an ANTI-GUN cop, DA, judge?
What about the Federal GFSZA for long guns?
----insert additional speculative forum cliches here, please----
