Medical Cannabis bill

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by The Annoyed Man »

rotor wrote:There are two uses for narcotics, the addicts that need it for their high and those with pain, severe and chronic, cancer, etc. that must have legitimate pain relief. In the wisdom of the feds they made it almost impossible for doctors to continue to supply the legitimate users of narcotics last October ( yes I am talking about hydrocodone). So, these poor souls that struggle with unbearable pain have a difficult time getting meds courtesy of the feds. But at the same time they are relaxing prosecution of the recreational use of MJ with questionable medical value. It's okay to get high but live with the pain according to the DEA. I hope that people here are not of the feeling that they are safe using and carrying at the same time.
That is me. I just picked up a new scrip today, for something that I ran out of last week, because my doctor was out of town for the week. It was a tough week. Also, because it is such a PIA to get it refilled, I stretch it out and make the prescription last longer than the dosing instructions on the bottle. I make deliberate decisions to live with some pain, so that I don't have to be out of stock when the pain gets really bad. And by the way, they aren't actually refills. Each one is its own discreet prescription. It is actually making me consider changing doctors, for the simple reason that I live in Grapevine, but my Doctor's office relocated to Keller a while back. As long as I only have to drive there a couple of times a year for my checkups, I'm OK with the distance. But if I have to go visit him each time I need to get a renewed prescription of pain meds, then it is a problem. So I'm considering changing providers to a doctor in the Grapevine area.

Yeah, the DEA made an enemy out of me for life in October.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
rotor
Senior Member
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by rotor »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
rotor wrote:There are two uses for narcotics, the addicts that need it for their high and those with pain, severe and chronic, cancer, etc. that must have legitimate pain relief. In the wisdom of the feds they made it almost impossible for doctors to continue to supply the legitimate users of narcotics last October ( yes I am talking about hydrocodone). So, these poor souls that struggle with unbearable pain have a difficult time getting meds courtesy of the feds. But at the same time they are relaxing prosecution of the recreational use of MJ with questionable medical value. It's okay to get high but live with the pain according to the DEA. I hope that people here are not of the feeling that they are safe using and carrying at the same time.
That is me. I just picked up a new scrip today, for something that I ran out of last week, because my doctor was out of town for the week. It was a tough week. Also, because it is such a PIA to get it refilled, I stretch it out and make the prescription last longer than the dosing instructions on the bottle. I make deliberate decisions to live with some pain, so that I don't have to be out of stock when the pain gets really bad. And by the way, they aren't actually refills. Each one is its own discreet prescription. It is actually making me consider changing doctors, for the simple reason that I live in Grapevine, but my Doctor's office relocated to Keller a while back. As long as I only have to drive there a couple of times a year for my checkups, I'm OK with the distance. But if I have to go visit him each time I need to get a renewed prescription of pain meds, then it is a problem. So I'm considering changing providers to a doctor in the Grapevine area.

Yeah, the DEA made an enemy out of me for life in October.
TAM, I really feel sorry for you and the millions of people being hurt by this obnoxious rule by the feds without thought for the misery that it causes. We know that more people are killed by legal drugs than illegal drugs but the feds have gone overboard and the innocent people with severe pain suffer. The doctors of course are the ones being blamed for not giving refills and fewer doctors are willing to take on patients like yourself because of the liability. This is a terrible problem. To me this is more important than the possible benefit (although there may be some) of marijuana being used for medicinal use. I hope that people write their legislators and complain and ask for a reasonable change back to end the suffering this has brought.
User avatar
Bitter Clinger
Banned
Posts: 2593
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by Bitter Clinger »

What possible harm could a little pot smoking lead to?

Image
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
rentz
Senior Member
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 9:16 am
Location: DFW

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by rentz »

The Annoyed Man wrote:
rotor wrote:There are two uses for narcotics, the addicts that need it for their high and those with pain, severe and chronic, cancer, etc. that must have legitimate pain relief. In the wisdom of the feds they made it almost impossible for doctors to continue to supply the legitimate users of narcotics last October ( yes I am talking about hydrocodone). So, these poor souls that struggle with unbearable pain have a difficult time getting meds courtesy of the feds. But at the same time they are relaxing prosecution of the recreational use of MJ with questionable medical value. It's okay to get high but live with the pain according to the DEA. I hope that people here are not of the feeling that they are safe using and carrying at the same time.
That is me. I just picked up a new scrip today, for something that I ran out of last week, because my doctor was out of town for the week. It was a tough week. Also, because it is such a PIA to get it refilled, I stretch it out and make the prescription last longer than the dosing instructions on the bottle. I make deliberate decisions to live with some pain, so that I don't have to be out of stock when the pain gets really bad. And by the way, they aren't actually refills. Each one is its own discreet prescription. It is actually making me consider changing doctors, for the simple reason that I live in Grapevine, but my Doctor's office relocated to Keller a while back. As long as I only have to drive there a couple of times a year for my checkups, I'm OK with the distance. But if I have to go visit him each time I need to get a renewed prescription of pain meds, then it is a problem. So I'm considering changing providers to a doctor in the Grapevine area.

Yeah, the DEA made an enemy out of me for life in October.

I'd be willing to bet that IF medicinal marijuana passes in Texas it would still be easier to get than RX narcotics.
Anytime I get pain or migraine meds i've got to take the script in person to the pharmacy instead of it being called in or faxed, its such a pain.
winters
Banned
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 1:14 pm

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by winters »

The comments on this thread crack me up. people complain about how hard it is to get oxy and whatever. I bet for every legit medical pot smoker there is 50 just wanting it to get high. Presciption drugs have been made hard to get by people who are just looking for a high.
User avatar
Roger Howard
Senior Member
Posts: 453
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: Texas City, TX

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by Roger Howard »

winters wrote:So how do you fill out the 4473 form when you buy a gun without breaking the law when it asks:

"Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?"

This is a federal form not state so how does it being legal at the state level matter?

Other then this I'm not going to express my opinion about marijuana users as I'm sure it would get me banned.Im sure this question will get the arm chair lawyers to post.
The question on 4473 ask if your an unlawful user. Someone with a prescription would be a lawful user.

Just my 2c. IANAL
If guns kill people, then I can blame mispelled words on my pencil

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Medical Cannabis bill

Post by ScottDLS »

Roger Howard wrote:
winters wrote:So how do you fill out the 4473 form when you buy a gun without breaking the law when it asks:

"Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?"

This is a federal form not state so how does it being legal at the state level matter?

Other then this I'm not going to express my opinion about marijuana users as I'm sure it would get me banned.Im sure this question will get the arm chair lawyers to post.
The question on 4473 ask if your an unlawful user. Someone with a prescription would be a lawful user.

Just my 2c. IANAL
Not under current federal law. I liked the one they had in the '80's... Are you a habitual drunkard? "rlol"
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”