"Category" No longer on CHL

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
TheCytochromeC
Senior Member
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:00 pm
Location: DFW

"Category" No longer on CHL

Post by TheCytochromeC »

I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Keith B »

TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
The requirement was removed last legislative session. There is no longer an SA / NSA category. A person may qualify with a revolver and is allowed to carry a semi-auto. if you previoulsy had a NSA category you are now allowed to carry a semi-auto.

See viewtopic.php?f=125&t=67035" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

Excellent. I did not know this. It was a stupid concept to begin with.
mr1337
Senior Member
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by mr1337 »

Yeah, I think it stemmed out of the myth that semi-autos are more complicated than revolvers.

They aren't, really. There's maybe 1 extra step to get it ready to fire (racking the slide to chamber the round), but unless it malfunctions, it's just as simple.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
User avatar
Wolverine
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:57 pm

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Wolverine »

TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
Some people argue you can legally carry full auto and other NFA firearms without a CHL if it has the tax stamp.
"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."
III
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by ScottDLS »

Wolverine wrote:
TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
Some people argue you can legally carry full auto and other NFA firearms without a CHL if it has the tax stamp.
You can. It's no different than carrying any other long gun. If it's legally owned (i.e. has the Federal NFA tax stamp), you can carry.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
User avatar
TexDotCom
Senior Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 2:39 pm
Location: Garland, TX

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by TexDotCom »

I noticed they did, however, *add* "VETERAN" to mine when I renewed in August. That wasn't there previously, even though I paid the lower cost as an honorably discharged vet and proved my status both times with my DD-214.


:txflag:
User avatar
Wolverine
Member
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:57 pm

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Wolverine »

ScottDLS wrote:
Wolverine wrote:
TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
Some people argue you can legally carry full auto and other NFA firearms without a CHL if it has the tax stamp.
You can. It's no different than carrying any other long gun. If it's legally owned (i.e. has the Federal NFA tax stamp), you can carry.
I was thinking more along the lines of a MAC-10.
"When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."
III
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Keith B »

Wolverine wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Wolverine wrote:
TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
Some people argue you can legally carry full auto and other NFA firearms without a CHL if it has the tax stamp.
You can. It's no different than carrying any other long gun. If it's legally owned (i.e. has the Federal NFA tax stamp), you can carry.
I was thinking more along the lines of a MAC-10.
A MAC-10 is legally a pistol or handgun. If you have an NFA and a CHL, then you can conceal it. You cannot legally conceal in Texas with just a NFA stamp.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by ScottDLS »

Wolverine wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Wolverine wrote:
TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
Some people argue you can legally carry full auto and other NFA firearms without a CHL if it has the tax stamp.
You can. It's no different than carrying any other long gun. If it's legally owned (i.e. has the Federal NFA tax stamp), you can carry.
I was thinking more along the lines of a MAC-10.
I have one and have considered trying to carry it. Though they are really heavy. Apparently there is some "case law" from before CHL that says that a Machine Gun, even a machine pistol like a MAC is not a handgun, so you could carry w/o CHL. If it IS a handgun then you could carry w/ CHL...

As a practical matter, forget it. Open bolt design is very dangerous to carry locked and loaded. The recoil and muzzle flash on full auto is tough and the cyclic rate is 1200RPM. Short barrel means you need to be really careful w/ two hand grip lest you shoot a finger off. Forget about one hand grip. Even on semi it's hard to hold straight, but for spray and pray. Lot's o' fun.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by ScottDLS »

Keith B wrote:
Wolverine wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Wolverine wrote:
TheCytochromeC wrote:I just renewed (w00t) and noticed that Category is no longer on the card. Anyone know the reasoning behind this? Can I carry an auto now? :evil2:
Some people argue you can legally carry full auto and other NFA firearms without a CHL if it has the tax stamp.
You can. It's no different than carrying any other long gun. If it's legally owned (i.e. has the Federal NFA tax stamp), you can carry.
I was thinking more along the lines of a MAC-10.
A MAC-10 is legally a pistol or handgun. If you have an NFA and a CHL, then you can conceal it. You cannot legally conceal in Texas with just a NFA stamp.
Keith I believe there is some case law on this and that a machine gun of any size is NOT a handgun.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Keith B »

ScottDLS wrote:
Keith B wrote:
A MAC 10 is legally a pistol or handgun. If you have an NFA and a CHL, then you can conceal it. You cannot legally conceal in Texas with just a NFA stamp.
Keith I believe there is some case law on this and that a machine gun of any size is NOT a handgun.
Not sure about the case law as federal guidelines may say the MAC 10 is not a machine pistol, but a sub-machine gun. However, for Texas per penal code 46.01:
(5) "Handgun" means any firearm that is designed, made, or adapted to be fired with one hand.
While it would be hard to hold and control a MAC 10 it might be one of those beat the rap, but not the ride deals. However, if you had a NFA stamp and CHL it would definitely cover you. :thumbs2:
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by Oldgringo »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:Excellent. I did not know this. It was a stupid concept to begin with.
:iagree:
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: "Category" No longer on CHL

Post by ScottDLS »

Keith B wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Keith B wrote:
A MAC 10 is legally a pistol or handgun. If you have an NFA and a CHL, then you can conceal it. You cannot legally conceal in Texas with just a NFA stamp.
Keith I believe there is some case law on this and that a machine gun of any size is NOT a handgun.
Not sure about the case law as federal guidelines may say the MAC 10 is not a machine pistol, but a sub-machine gun. However, for Texas per penal code 46.01:
(5) "Handgun" means any firearm that is designed, made, or adapted to be fired with one hand.
While it would be hard to hold and control a MAC 10 it might be one of those beat the rap, but not the ride deals. However, if you had a NFA stamp and CHL it would definitely cover you. :thumbs2:

I was pretty sure someone posted on this forum that a Texas appellate case decided that a machinegun is by definition not a handgun. I think the reasoning is that it is a prohibited weapon per 46.01, which a handgun is not. So it must be one or the other. Anyway, at about 10lb it's gonna be real hard to conceal and carry. ;-)
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”