X games at the circuit of the Americas
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
X games at the circuit of the Americas
Don't think the athletes are professionals. Wondering if the COTA is posted. Anyone been there lately?
- CleverNickname
- Senior Member
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Gamesralewis wrote:Don't think the athletes are professionals.
"Participants compete to win bronze, silver, and gold medals, as well as prize money."
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
It ended up being a moot point as my opportunity for a few tickets tonight fell through.CleverNickname wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Gamesralewis wrote:Don't think the athletes are professionals.
"Participants compete to win bronze, silver, and gold medals, as well as prize money."
We've discussed the definition of a professional sporting event a over the years, and I've probably started 1 or 2 of the threads. I do believe the intent of the law is meant for stuff like the XGames though. Had I gone today, I was leaning toward not carrying just because it does sort of at least feel like a 'professional' sporting event. I guess if the threshold is money though, I can't carry at golf tournaments at my golf club because prizes (pro shop credit from the course, cash out of a player $$ pool) are awarded. That doesn't seem reasonable. I'm sure the real answer is somewhere in there, but it's still not always obvious.
- Scott in Houston
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Houston
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
If there's a national governing body for the sport(s), And there's money, it's a slam dunk... Do not carry.ralewis wrote:It ended up being a moot point as my opportunity for a few tickets tonight fell through.CleverNickname wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Gamesralewis wrote:Don't think the athletes are professionals.
"Participants compete to win bronze, silver, and gold medals, as well as prize money."
We've discussed the definition of a professional sporting event a over the years, and I've probably started 1 or 2 of the threads. I do believe the intent of the law is meant for stuff like the XGames though. Had I gone today, I was leaning toward not carrying just because it does sort of at least feel like a 'professional' sporting event. I guess if the threshold is money though, I can't carry at golf tournaments at my golf club because prizes (pro shop credit from the course, cash out of a player $$ pool) are awarded. That doesn't seem reasonable. I'm sure the real answer is somewhere in there, but it's still not always obvious.
The X Games would definitely be off limits.
Your golf club example is clearly amateur even though here are prizes, but I get what you mean. I'm sure if someone tried to prosecute under those conditions, the "would a reasonable person..." standard would be applied. No reasonable person would call that a professional event.
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
It's not 100%, but if it is televised it's pretty safe to say it's a sporting event you can't carry at.
X Games is clearly a professional sporting event.
X Games is clearly a professional sporting event.
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
Certainly agree that it seems like a professional sporting event. And it does appear to be prize money for the X Games, but ESPN is a private corporation not a governing body. But seeming like a professional sporting event and meeting the legal definition of one is 2 different things.Scott in Houston wrote:If there's a national governing body for the sport(s), And there's money, it's a slam dunk... Do not carry.ralewis wrote:It ended up being a moot point as my opportunity for a few tickets tonight fell through.CleverNickname wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Gamesralewis wrote:Don't think the athletes are professionals.
"Participants compete to win bronze, silver, and gold medals, as well as prize money."
We've discussed the definition of a professional sporting event a over the years, and I've probably started 1 or 2 of the threads. I do believe the intent of the law is meant for stuff like the XGames though. Had I gone today, I was leaning toward not carrying just because it does sort of at least feel like a 'professional' sporting event. I guess if the threshold is money though, I can't carry at golf tournaments at my golf club because prizes (pro shop credit from the course, cash out of a player $$ pool) are awarded. That doesn't seem reasonable. I'm sure the real answer is somewhere in there, but it's still not always obvious.
The X Games would definitely be off limits.
Your golf club example is clearly amateur even though here are prizes, but I get what you mean. I'm sure if someone tried to prosecute under those conditions, the "would a reasonable person..." standard would be applied. No reasonable person would call that a professional event.
What about 2 other examples?
What about the US Amateur Golf championships? Televised, national affiliation, but no prize money.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Sta ... ampionship_(golf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
How bout the Olympics?
- Scott in Houston
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Houston
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
The PGA, NFL, NBA... Etc. all private corporations and governing bodies for their sport.
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
But they aren't the professional affiliation to which all the participants belong or are represented by. That's what I meant. They are a for profit broadcaster that brings together a collection of athletes.Scott in Houston wrote:The PGA, NFL, NBA... Etc. all private corporations and governing bodies for their sport.
Not trying to perpetuate an argument. Point I'm making is it's not always clear what the definition of a professional sporting event is.
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
Not posted, Im there often.
But almost EVERY event is a professional sporting event. Not all, but most, and ALL I have gone to,,,with the exception of track days that use the track as a venue.
But almost EVERY event is a professional sporting event. Not all, but most, and ALL I have gone to,,,with the exception of track days that use the track as a venue.
Companion animal Microchips, quality name brand chips, lifetime registration, Low cost just $10~12, not for profit, most locations we can come to you. We cover eight counties McLennan, Hill, Bell, Coryell, Falls, Bosque, Limestone, Lampasas
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Contact we.chip.pets@gmail.com
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
Yes, but they are professional athletes competing for prize money.ralewis wrote:But they aren't the professional affiliation to which all the participants belong or are represented by. That's what I meant. They are a for profit broadcaster that brings together a collection of athletes.Scott in Houston wrote:The PGA, NFL, NBA... Etc. all private corporations and governing bodies for their sport.
Not trying to perpetuate an argument. Point I'm making is it's not always clear what the definition of a professional sporting event is.
Olympics, not even going there. It will be 17 years before there is even a possibility of having the Olympics in Texas. I'd actually guess a minimum of 50 years until it's over a 10% chance and even that's optimistic.
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
So it's about the type of participant? What about a community baseball league that has players that are students? What about a softball game between competing professional firefighter's union locals? Has the word professional in it?TVGuy wrote:Yes, but they are professional athletes competing for prize money.ralewis wrote:But they aren't the professional affiliation to which all the participants belong or are represented by. That's what I meant. They are a for profit broadcaster that brings together a collection of athletes.Scott in Houston wrote:The PGA, NFL, NBA... Etc. all private corporations and governing bodies for their sport.
Not trying to perpetuate an argument. Point I'm making is it's not always clear what the definition of a professional sporting event is.
Olympics, not even going there. It will be 17 years before there is even a possibility of having the Olympics in Texas. I'd actually guess a minimum of 50 years until it's over a 10% chance and even that's optimistic.
Again, the point of the question wasn't so much to get an answer as illustrate that it's not always clear/obvious what's a professional sporting event. X Games certainly feels like one.
Sure woulda been nice to have had HB 308 eh? Wouldn't be a need for the debate at all....
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
Frankly, I feel like it is pretty clear what a professional sporting event is.ralewis wrote:So it's about the type of participant? What about a community baseball league that has players that are students? What about a softball game between competing professional firefighter's union locals? Has the word professional in it?TVGuy wrote:Yes, but they are professional athletes competing for prize money.ralewis wrote:But they aren't the professional affiliation to which all the participants belong or are represented by. That's what I meant. They are a for profit broadcaster that brings together a collection of athletes.Scott in Houston wrote:The PGA, NFL, NBA... Etc. all private corporations and governing bodies for their sport.
Not trying to perpetuate an argument. Point I'm making is it's not always clear what the definition of a professional sporting event is.
Olympics, not even going there. It will be 17 years before there is even a possibility of having the Olympics in Texas. I'd actually guess a minimum of 50 years until it's over a 10% chance and even that's optimistic.
Again, the point of the question wasn't so much to get an answer as illustrate that it's not always clear/obvious what's a professional sporting event. X Games certainly feels like one.
Sure woulda been nice to have had HB 308 eh? Wouldn't be a need for the debate at all....
Your baseball and softball scenarios are a bit silly.
Yes, HB 308 would have been great, but it didn't happen.
Re: X games at the circuit of the Americas
Of course they are silly. Making a point, and I actually don't feel it's completely clear what the definition of a professional sporting event is. I'm not going to persist with this anymore as it'll just be unnecessarily argumentative.TVGuy wrote:Frankly, I feel like it is pretty clear what a professional sporting event is.ralewis wrote:So it's about the type of participant? What about a community baseball league that has players that are students? What about a softball game between competing professional firefighter's union locals? Has the word professional in it?TVGuy wrote:Yes, but they are professional athletes competing for prize money.ralewis wrote:But they aren't the professional affiliation to which all the participants belong or are represented by. That's what I meant. They are a for profit broadcaster that brings together a collection of athletes.Scott in Houston wrote:The PGA, NFL, NBA... Etc. all private corporations and governing bodies for their sport.
Not trying to perpetuate an argument. Point I'm making is it's not always clear what the definition of a professional sporting event is.
Olympics, not even going there. It will be 17 years before there is even a possibility of having the Olympics in Texas. I'd actually guess a minimum of 50 years until it's over a 10% chance and even that's optimistic.
Again, the point of the question wasn't so much to get an answer as illustrate that it's not always clear/obvious what's a professional sporting event. X Games certainly feels like one.
Sure woulda been nice to have had HB 308 eh? Wouldn't be a need for the debate at all....
Your baseball and softball scenarios are a bit silly.
Yes, HB 308 would have been great, but it didn't happen.
