I think it would be 46.02 UCW. If you are not carrying IAW with the manner prescribed by the Handgun License (i.e. not in a holster) then you don't get the Defense/Non-Applicability offered by 46.15.Salty1 wrote:theTexan hit the nail on the head, as of yet we do not really know what type of enforcement will become the operating procedure for each PD in each area. What I do understand is that if a certain area decides a certain holster does not meet the definition as they see it then it will cost a lot of money to defend it. I do wonder what the charge would be if it was decided that the holster did not meet their definition and one was arrested for it.......
My take on what is a belt/shoulder holster is it's one that could easily go on a belt or shoulder rig, regardless of whether it is, in fact, on one or not. I have an Uncle Mikes with a belt clip that I clip to my pants sometimes without a belt.
I believe the intent of the holster language was to keep people from open carrying in their hand or stuffed down their "drawers" while still visible. Sure, the proverbial bad cop/prosecutor combination can jam you up for anything they want... I mean who knew it was a felony for a Texas governor to veto a bill...? Meanwhile, forgive me when I don't curl up on the floor crying on 1/1/2016 in contemplation of the evil county DA's.
