


ugh...

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
srothstein wrote:I just wanted to point out that this is now just a job questiob between you and them. You cannot be arrested for having the CHL at work, just fired. To be prosecutable, that written notice you signed would have to have the 30.06 wording.
It is pretty clear notice you would get fired if they found out though.
You need to do a bit more research and soul-searching.particle wrote:My company's policy says "no unauthorized firearms blah blah blah". I figure the state of Texas authorized me by granting my CHL, so I'm somewhat safe.
Sounds like you need a nice old cap and ball revolver.AggieC05 wrote:"Navarre corporation prohibits its employees from carrying or possessing firearms while acting in the course and scope of the employment."
My actual company's policy says "Having unauthorized firearms or weapons on (company name) premises or while on (company name) business"Skiprr wrote:You need to do a bit more research and soul-searching.particle wrote:My company's policy says "no unauthorized firearms blah blah blah". I figure the state of Texas authorized me by granting my CHL, so I'm somewhat safe.
Our Texas laws are, for the most part, written with specificity.
If your company's policy is "no unauthorized firearms blah blah blah" then you can't be immediately charged with criminal trespass, but you can be summarily fired. In Texas, a "will to work" state, you can be fired for anything so long as the reason is not class-based, like age or race.
If your company's policy is written in correct 30.06 language, you can be arrested and charged with criminal trespass. Not good.
My former employer, a Fortune 500, had us acknowledge every year that we had been "told" the company policies. This meant that we had been given notice under 30.06. We, too, could have been arrested and charged with criminal trespass. Not good.