Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!) guns

Discussion of other state's CHL's & reciprocity

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar
ELB
Senior Member
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!) guns

Post by ELB »

Nassau County, on Long Island, New York, enacted an ordinance which bans handguns in non-traditional colors, such as pink. The ordinance declares such firearms to be “deceptively colored.”

On December 28, the Appellate Division, Second Department (the intermediate court of appeals) ruled 4–0 that the Nassau ban is ...
Go RTWT at the Volokh post by Kopel

Case here: Chwikc v Mulvey
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar
USA1
Senior Member
Posts: 7412
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: Tomball ,Texas
Contact:

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by USA1 »

*moan*
Glock Armorer - S&W M&P Armorer
RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by RPB »

but ......... they were donating to Susan Komen breast cancer for every pink one sold ......

Komen foundation gave some money to Planned Parenthood for Breast Cancer Awareness education

Conclusion:
This law fails to be "equal protection under the law" Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as it discriminates against females.
Last edited by RPB on Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar
baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by baldeagle »

Was there any doubt that Mayor Bloomberg is an idiot?
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar
OldSchool
Senior Member
Posts: 728
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 9:01 pm
Location: Brazoria County

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by OldSchool »

Good gravy, that is so STUPID!!! :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Life is for learning.
IANAL, thank gosh!
NRA Life Member - TSRA - PSC
NRA Certified Basic Rifle Instructor, Chief Range Safety Officer

12/23/2009: Packets delivered.
01/15/2010: Plastic in hand!
User avatar
ELB
Senior Member
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by ELB »

Y'all did follow the link and find out that the ordinance was tossed out in court via state pre-emption, right? ;-)
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar
ELB
Senior Member
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by ELB »

Oh, and keep in mind that Nassau county is where the District Attorney forbids anyone in his office from possessing a handgun or apply for a handgun permit as a condition of employment.

http://defensivehandgun.blogspot.com/20 ... arred.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
USAF 1982-2005
____________
philip964
Senior Member
Posts: 18459
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by philip964 »

I thought you couldn't have a gun in New York anyway. So the gun you can't own, now can't be pink.
User avatar
Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by Oldgringo »

baldeagle wrote:Was there any doubt that Mayor Bloomberg is an idiot?
Mayor Bloomberg and his ilk do not elect themselves. They are elected by idiots who vote and who breed more idiots.
User avatar
terryg
Senior Member
Posts: 1719
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:37 pm
Location: Alvin, TX

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by terryg »

Darn it! I was wrong. I guessed Kalifornia!!
... this space intentionally left blank ...
User avatar
Cobra Medic
Senior Member
Posts: 415
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:53 pm

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by Cobra Medic »

Oldgringo wrote:
baldeagle wrote:Was there any doubt that Mayor Bloomberg is an idiot?
Mayor Bloomberg and his ilk do not elect themselves. They are elected by idiots who vote and who breed more idiots.
Who is the bigger idiot? The parasite or the host that doesn't remove the parasite?
This will only hurt a little. What comes next, more so.
User avatar
PappaGun
Senior Member
Posts: 743
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:34 pm
Location: After 4:30 you can usually find me at a Brew Pub

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by PappaGun »

Oldgringo wrote:
Mayor Bloomberg and his ilk do not elect themselves. They are elected by idiots who vote and who breed more idiots.

But you can bet they voted for themselves.

:smilelol5:
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe."
- Noah Webster

"All we ask for is registration, just like we do for cars."
- Charles Schumer
User avatar
i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by i8godzilla »

I read the article and IMHO the ruling goes way further than overturning the "Pink Handgun" issue.
Voloka wrote:
"If each of New York’s 62 counties enacted ordinances that placed additional restrictions on licenses, as the amended ordinance effectively does, the uniformity in firearm licensing that the Legislature intended would be destroyed.”
The 4-0 ruling indicates (to me) that the preemption of state hand gun laws is not permissible.
nycourts.gov wrote:
http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseri ... _09911.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Under the doctrine of conflict preemption, a local law is preempted by a State law when a "right or benefit is expressly given . . . by [] State law which has then been curtailed or taken away by the local law"
So what does this do to NYC's litany of hand gun laws?
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
User avatar
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts: 9604
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by RoyGBiv »

Cobra Medic wrote:Who is the bigger idiot? The parasite or the host that doesn't remove the parasite?
Exactly...

And..

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/03 ... mberg.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Guess that state: Banning "deceptively colored" (pink!)

Post by hirundo82 »

i8godzilla wrote:So what does this do to NYC's litany of hand gun laws?
NYC has always had a special status in New York firearms laws. For example, handgun permits issued in the rest of the state do not allow carry in NYC, and rifles and shotguns require a permit to own in NYC but not in the rest of New York.
Post Reply

Return to “Other States”