Took my new FN Hi Power for a test run today....
Moderator: carlson1
Took my new FN Hi Power for a test run today....
It's the SFS model in 40 S&W. I paid a total of $425 including shipping and transfer fees and I nought it form On Point Firearms. I had heard some bad things about On Point, but I had no trouble with them. I actually like the SFS system, but trigger pull is still a bit heavy for a single action. The gun has a slim profile which actually feels a bit too small for my large mitts. Accuracy was better than my G27 at the same range. Maybe when I figure out the best way to hold it my accuracy will improve some. I wish it had a larger magazine capacity, at 10 rounds it's the same as my G27. Overall I'm satisfied with it, although I kind of wish I would have bought the Taurus 1911. I hear some are going for $460 at the gun shows. Oh well, time to start saving for the next gun, or maybe a reloader. Who knows.
Sounds like you did alright. The hi-power has an excellent reputation for a reason. I think the 1911 still beats it because, hey, I like .45, but there is no question that the hi-power is a very capable, reliable pistol.
The trigger can be improved. Before you go sending it off for a trigger job (and whatever you do, don't lighten any springs without careful measurement), you might look at removing the magazine disconnect. It rubs against the face of the magazine when you pull the trigger, so it creates some weight and a bit of a gritty feel. In my opinion, the mainspring can be lightened a tad without sacrificing safety, but that should ONLY be done by a competent 'smith who has carefully fitted the trigger group already.
I don't know what grips came on it, but the only ones I like on the HP are the two-piece wraparounds from Pachmayr. They fatten the grip up enough to make it more comfortable in my hands.
I think that you did better than a Taurus 1911. From what I hear (I still have yet to get my paws on one), the Taurus leaves a good bit to be desired.
Oh, and any pictures of the new baby?
The trigger can be improved. Before you go sending it off for a trigger job (and whatever you do, don't lighten any springs without careful measurement), you might look at removing the magazine disconnect. It rubs against the face of the magazine when you pull the trigger, so it creates some weight and a bit of a gritty feel. In my opinion, the mainspring can be lightened a tad without sacrificing safety, but that should ONLY be done by a competent 'smith who has carefully fitted the trigger group already.
I don't know what grips came on it, but the only ones I like on the HP are the two-piece wraparounds from Pachmayr. They fatten the grip up enough to make it more comfortable in my hands.
I think that you did better than a Taurus 1911. From what I hear (I still have yet to get my paws on one), the Taurus leaves a good bit to be desired.
Oh, and any pictures of the new baby?
What, pray tell, have you heard about the PT1911?I think that you did better than a Taurus 1911. From what I hear (I still have yet to get my paws on one), the Taurus leaves a good bit to be desired.
Owning a Kimber and two Springfields, I liked my first PT1911 enough that I bought a second one.
What I read online are numerous cases of the PT1911 firing any kind of ammo without problem, something neither my Kimber or Springfield would do.
I can't find fault with either one. Fit and finish is excellent (although the finish may be somewhat soft, it is well done), trigger is excellent, and tons of extra features.
Oddly enough, my buddy bought a new .40 Hi-Power at the last show and he wants to trade for one of my Pt1911's.
Mike
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
AF5MS
TSRA Life Member
NRA Benefactor Member
- stevie_d_64
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact: