Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Discussion of other state's CHL's & reciprocity

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

Post Reply
User avatar
JJVP
Senior Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Post by JJVP »

BAY CITY — When a Bay City party store worker wore a “stun gun” on the job for personal protection, he was charged with a crime.

A Bay County judge ruled today, though, that the Michigan law prohibiting possession of stun guns is unconstitutional.

http://www.mlive.com/news/bay-city/inde ... ays_s.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; :patriot:
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Post by WildBill »

Interesting. I imagine this ruling will be appealed. It seems like a ban on switchblade knives would also be unconstitional according to this judge.
NRA Endowment Member
stroo
Senior Member
Posts: 1682
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Coppell

Re: Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Post by stroo »

Why would you ban stun guns? Just confirms the craziness of the state I grew up in.
User avatar
JJVP
Senior Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Post by JJVP »

WildBill wrote:Interesting. I imagine this ruling will be appealed. It seems like a ban on switchblade knives would also be unconstitutional according to this judge.
I don't think that a ban on switchblades is the same thing. He ruled that the state could regulate but not outright ban stun-guns. If they had a outright ban on knives, then he would rule the same way. But a ban against switchblades would not be, since they were not banning knives, just regulating the kinds you could and could not use. IANAL, YMMV. :smash:
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
User avatar
i8godzilla
Senior Member
Posts: 1184
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:13 am
Location: Central TX
Contact:

Re: Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Post by i8godzilla »

This is my favorite paragraph in the story.
At the time, Yanna said he wasn’t aware of the law and his father in Texas had given him the stun gun. Yanna’s coworker had a handgun in a holster on his hip when police visited the store, but the worker wasn’t charged with any crime because it is legal to carry a firearm without a permit so long as it is not concealed.
It also seems Yanna was a convicted felon and he can not have a firearm. I guess the stun gun was his only choice for protection.
No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefor. -- Murdock v. Pennsylvania
If the State converts a right into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right with impunity. -- Shuttleworth v. City of Birmingham
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Michigan stun-gun ban ruled unconstitutional

Post by WildBill »

JJVP wrote:
WildBill wrote:Interesting. I imagine this ruling will be appealed. It seems like a ban on switchblade knives would also be unconstitutional according to this judge.
I don't think that a ban on switchblades is the same thing. He ruled that the state could regulate but not outright ban stun-guns. If they had a outright ban on knives, then he would rule the same way. But a ban against switchblades would not be, since they were not banning knives, just regulating the kinds you could and could not use. IANAL, YMMV. :smash:
Good points. :tiphat:
NRA Endowment Member
Post Reply

Return to “Other States”