Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts: 1457
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Scott B. »

I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT
Solaris
Banned
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:06 pm

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Solaris »

Scott B. wrote:I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
Texas is very LEO friendly. You can pretty much carry anywhere.

A Texas LTC will give you NICS exemption, and covers you in Federal Gun free School Zones (which you do not need as a currently serving FLEO).
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by ScottDLS »

Solaris wrote:
Scott B. wrote:I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
Texas is very LEO friendly. You can pretty much carry anywhere.

A Texas LTC will give you NICS exemption, and covers you in Federal Gun free School Zones (which you do not need as a currently serving FLEO).
It will cover you while off duty in a school zone in Texas which GFSZA technically prohibits.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
16Adams
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:07 am

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by 16Adams »

Active and Honorably Retired qualify for LEOSA concealed carry nationwide- with a lot of restrictions and territorial interpretation. Google LEOSA lots of information out there. The LTC will get you some places LEOSA won't.
One website refers to multiple LTC "permission slips" to carry as a "grand jury kit".

I was stopped recently and displayed my LEOSA credentials and the young officer wasn't familiar- but he did understand LTC.
Solaris
Banned
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:06 pm

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Solaris »

ScottDLS wrote:
Solaris wrote:
Scott B. wrote:I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
Texas is very LEO friendly. You can pretty much carry anywhere.

A Texas LTC will give you NICS exemption, and covers you in Federal Gun free School Zones (which you do not need as a currently serving FLEO).
It will cover you while off duty in a school zone in Texas which GFSZA technically prohibits.
As a current FLEO he does not need that protection.
Solaris
Banned
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:06 pm

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Solaris »

16Adams wrote:Active and Honorably Retired qualify for LEOSA concealed carry nationwide- with a helluva lot of restrictions and territorial interpretation. Google LEOSA lots of information out there. The LTC will get you some places LEOSA won't.
One website refers to multiple LTC "permission slips" to carry as a "grand jury kit".

I was stopped recently and displayed my LEOSA credentials and the young officer wasn't familiar- but he did understand LTC.
He implied he was a current FLEO. That gives him more carry rights than LTC, LEOSA. He has full 46.02, 46.03 and 30.05 protection. Can pretty much go anywhere without restriction, including Flying While Armed.
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by ScottDLS »

Solaris wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Solaris wrote:
Scott B. wrote:I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
Texas is very LEO friendly. You can pretty much carry anywhere.

A Texas LTC will give you NICS exemption, and covers you in Federal Gun free School Zones (which you do not need as a currently serving FLEO).
It will cover you while off duty in a school zone in Texas which GFSZA technically prohibits.
As a current FLEO he does not need that protection.
Where does it say that in 18 USC 922q ? A "Special Investigator" (Texas term for FLEO) is not licensed by the State and say picking his kid up from school while off-duty, is arguably not "acting in his or her official capacity".

Remember this is the ATF that interprets GFSZA as it being a felony for anyone in Vermont to drive through a school zone armed, except on duty cops.

US 922g
(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the
possession of a firearm—
(i) on private property not part of school
grounds;
(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is
licensed to do so by the State in which the
school zone is located or a political subdivision
of the State,
...
(vi) by a law enforcement officer acting in
his or her official capacity
; or
Last edited by ScottDLS on Mon May 02, 2016 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
16Adams
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:07 am

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by 16Adams »

Solaris wrote:
16Adams wrote:Active and Honorably Retired qualify for LEOSA concealed carry nationwide- with a helluva lot of restrictions and territorial interpretation. Google LEOSA lots of information out there. The LTC will get you some places LEOSA won't.
One website refers to multiple LTC "permission slips" to carry as a "grand jury kit".

I was stopped recently and displayed my LEOSA credentials and the young officer wasn't familiar- but he did understand LTC.
He implied he was a current FLEO. That gives him more carry rights than LTC, LEOSA. He has full 46.02, 46.03 and 30.05 protection. Can pretty much go anywhere without restriction, including Flying While Armed.
You obviously know more than me. At one time (guess my time has passed) not all FLEO's were considered/classified as Texas Peace Officers. You obviously know something I don't, so I shall go.
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by ScottDLS »

16Adams wrote:
Solaris wrote:
16Adams wrote:Active and Honorably Retired qualify for LEOSA concealed carry nationwide- with a helluva lot of restrictions and territorial interpretation. Google LEOSA lots of information out there. The LTC will get you some places LEOSA won't.
One website refers to multiple LTC "permission slips" to carry as a "grand jury kit".

I was stopped recently and displayed my LEOSA credentials and the young officer wasn't familiar- but he did understand LTC.
He implied he was a current FLEO. That gives him more carry rights than LTC, LEOSA. He has full 46.02, 46.03 and 30.05 protection. Can pretty much go anywhere without restriction, including Flying While Armed.
You obviously know more than me. At one time (guess my time has passed) not all FLEO's were considered/classified as Texas Peace Officers. You obviously know something I don't, so I shall go.
See my post above. FLEO's are not licensed by the State of Texas any more than a Florida non-res CHL is regardless of whether they are considered Special Investigators/Peace Officers in PC 46, a FLEO carrying off duty in a school zone is violating 18 USC 922g (GFSZA).
Last edited by ScottDLS on Mon May 02, 2016 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Solaris
Banned
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:06 pm

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Solaris »

16Adams wrote:
Solaris wrote:
16Adams wrote:Active and Honorably Retired qualify for LEOSA concealed carry nationwide- with a helluva lot of restrictions and territorial interpretation. Google LEOSA lots of information out there. The LTC will get you some places LEOSA won't.
One website refers to multiple LTC "permission slips" to carry as a "grand jury kit".

I was stopped recently and displayed my LEOSA credentials and the young officer wasn't familiar- but he did understand LTC.
He implied he was a current FLEO. That gives him more carry rights than LTC, LEOSA. He has full 46.02, 46.03 and 30.05 protection. Can pretty much go anywhere without restriction, including Flying While Armed.
You obviously know more than me. At one time (guess my time has passed) not all FLEO's were considered/classified as Texas Peace Officers. You obviously know something I don't, so I shall go.
Correct, almost none are. They have their own class, Special Investigator.

I was giving him the benefit of the doubt he met the qualifications of a Special Investigator.
Solaris
Banned
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:06 pm

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Solaris »

ScottDLS wrote:
Solaris wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
Solaris wrote:
Scott B. wrote:I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
Texas is very LEO friendly. You can pretty much carry anywhere.

A Texas LTC will give you NICS exemption, and covers you in Federal Gun free School Zones (which you do not need as a currently serving FLEO).
It will cover you while off duty in a school zone in Texas which GFSZA technically prohibits.
As a current FLEO he does not need that protection.
Where does it say that in 18 USC 922q ? A "Special Agent" (Texas term for FLEO) is not licensed by the State and say picking his kid up from school while off-duty, is arguably not "acting in his or her official capacity".
Correct. It is not specified in the law. How funny it would be to see an ATF agent arrest himself when picking up his kid. Anyway that oversight was corrected in the implementing regulations. AFAIK, it is NOT corrected for LEOSA, so those folks are still not allowed to carry.
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by ScottDLS »

Solaris wrote: Correct. It is not specified in the law. How funny it would be to see an ATF agent arrest himself when picking up his kid. Anyway that oversight was corrected in the implementing regulations. AFAIK, it is NOT corrected for LEOSA, so those folks are still not allowed to carry.
Interesting. Where can one find in the CFR? And did ATF correct it for off-duty State LEO's?

And what was their statutory authority in 18 USC 922 to interpret away the requirement...maybe the same one that interpreted OOS licenses as not valid in GFSZ... :???:
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Solaris
Banned
Posts: 364
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:06 pm

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by Solaris »

ScottDLS wrote:
Solaris wrote: Correct. It is not specified in the law. How funny it would be to see an ATF agent arrest himself when picking up his kid. Anyway that oversight was corrected in the implementing regulations. AFAIK, it is NOT corrected for LEOSA, so those folks are still not allowed to carry.
Interesting. Where can one find in the CFR? And did ATF correct it for off-duty State LEO's?

And what was their statutory authority in 18 USC 922 to interpret away the requirement...maybe the same one that interpreted OOS licenses as not valid in GFSZ... :???:
Not sure if it is the CFR or other guidelines. As I recall we were told "you are acting in official capacity if you are authorized to carry a firearm and make an arrest." So if as long as you were not suspended or whatever you were GTG. I assume this interpretation applies to state LEOs but do not know.

Agency rule making authority is covered in the USC Title 5, I think.
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26885
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by The Annoyed Man »

ScottDLS wrote:
Solaris wrote:
Scott B. wrote:I know Texas Peace Officers are able to skip the CHL-100/class requirement and submit a range certification (or equivalent, I'm still a little unclear on that), and that Retired Federal Officers get the $25 discount, but still have the class requirement.

What break/benefit, if any, is there for currently serving Federal Officers who are Texas residents.

Thanks,
Texas is very LEO friendly. You can pretty much carry anywhere.

A Texas LTC will give you NICS exemption, and covers you in Federal Gun free School Zones (which you do not need as a currently serving FLEO).
It will cover you while off duty in a school zone in Texas which GFSZA technically prohibits.
GFSZA "rlol"

That didn't take long. :mrgreen:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar
ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts: 5095
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Federal LEO, Texas residents, LTC

Post by ScottDLS »

:iagree:

But do you really want to be the "test case" ? :biggrinjester:
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”