My logic is that it's only fair that a business which posts 30.06 and/or 30.07 be publicly acknowledged and avoided. Maybe if enough customers publicly declare they won't patronize a business, the business will address the issue.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Since their .06 and .07 signs are on the wall inside the restaurant, I probably wouldn't have seen them until I was walking out the door after finishing my food. These are not correctly posted signs, IMHO.F14Scott wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 2:41 pm I just started doing this https://www.yelp.com/biz/blanquitas-mex ... e=(direct).
My logic is that it's only fair that a business which posts 30.06 and/or 30.07 be publicly acknowledged and avoided. Maybe if enough customers publicly declare they won't patronize a business, the business will address the issue.
![]()
Hurrumph!F14Scott wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 2:53 pm The business will likely never see the 30.06 app. It will see its reviews' average go down and see a big photo of its sign on display, not hidden subtly inside the door.
The point of the public review is not to duplicate the great 30.06 app, it is to let the business know it is losing customers and give it a chance to fix its misguided attempt at "security."
Seems there are plenty of reasons to avoid this place. I wish them all the luck of the Titantic.Russell wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 4:06 pm Sometimes leaving bad reviews about a business because of their signage can get an insane response from the ownerhttp://www.houstonpress.com/restaurants ... ce-8805526
On one hand, that's scary. On the other hand, I doubt we're reading the full story.Soccerdad1995 wrote: Mon Jun 04, 2018 4:15 pm Just make sure that whatever you post is factually correct. A woman is being sued for $1m after leaving a bad review.
http://www.wafb.com/story/38305415/woma ... elp-review