http://upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.p ... 0112-5273r
I would hate to do the reloading for this puppy!
Jason
New from DrudgeReport
Moderator: carlson1
- jbirds1210
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3368
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
- Location: Texas City, Texas
New from DrudgeReport
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
TSRA Life Member
"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."
- HighVelocity
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: DFW, TX
- Contact:
- jimlongley
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
First of all, the cyclic rates of most machine guns are well above 60 rounds per minute, I can shoot my semi-autos that fast and have been known to approach that rate with a pump shotgun. That kind of error always makes me suspicious of the rest of the article.
Secondly, although the cyclic rate would be on the order of 240,000 rounds per minute, it would only last for however many rounds were stacked in a barrel and however many barrels were bundled. Yes it would deliver a lot of bullets fast, but not for very long. "Once fired, however, each spent barrel has to be reloaded."
Saw an article about them a while back, maybe in Popular Mechanics, and the disadvantages were covered quite well. This thing would be a special purpose weapon, not in the hands of regular troops.
Secondly, although the cyclic rate would be on the order of 240,000 rounds per minute, it would only last for however many rounds were stacked in a barrel and however many barrels were bundled. Yes it would deliver a lot of bullets fast, but not for very long. "Once fired, however, each spent barrel has to be reloaded."
Saw an article about them a while back, maybe in Popular Mechanics, and the disadvantages were covered quite well. This thing would be a special purpose weapon, not in the hands of regular troops.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365