Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
hooknbullet
Junior Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:46 pm

Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by hooknbullet »

Always Remember:
A firearm is only an instrument. It contains no evil, no conscience, and no ability. It is strictly the intent, competence, and character of its user that decide the outcome of any and all actions taken with it.
(I don't know who deserves credit for this quote, but I like it.)
BigDan
Member
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:57 am
Location: Round Rock, TX

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by BigDan »

Armed felon will beat the grand jury for the shooting itself.
He WILL get convicted for possessing a gun as a felon.
His wife will get a reduced sentence for arming a felon and obstructing justice.

IMO.
"How a politician stands on the Second Amendment tells you how he or she views you as an individual... as a trustworthy and productive citizen, or as part of an unruly crowd that needs to be lorded, controlled, supervised, and taken care of." - Fr. TX Rep. Suzanna Hupp
!حان أن أحصل على بعض
retrieverman
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:26 pm
Location: Nacogdoches, TX

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by retrieverman »

I am torn as to how I feel about the situation. The owner was wrong, but due to the weather situation and known potential for looters, I would have probably done something similar. :txflag:

I believe that if I was on the grand jury I would have to "no bill" the business owner, and since the illegal that actually did the shooting can't be found, I don't see that there is much you can do with him.
User avatar
flb_78
Senior Member
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:17 am
Location: Gravel Switch, KY
Contact:

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by flb_78 »

She should be prosecuted for employing an illegal, arming a felon, interfering with an investigation, and for the death of the thug. If she was so worried about her store, she should of stayed and protected it instead of arming a drug dealer.
http://www.AmarilloGunOwners.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Kythas
Senior Member
Posts: 1685
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:06 am
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by Kythas »

FTA: ""Ms. Lopez gave a convicted felon a firearm," Treviño said. "That's against the law. She lied to us from the onset of the investigation. That's against the law.""

Giving a convicted felon a firearm is against the law.

However, it's only against the law to lie to Federal law enforcement personnel. It's not illegal to lie to state/local law enforcement - unless the law's changed in the 12 years (wow, has it been that long?) since I've been a cop. Maybe he's referring to an obstruction of justice or interfering with a police investigation charge.
“I’m all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let’s start with typewriters.” - Frank Lloyd Wright

"Both oligarch and tyrant mistrust the people, and therefore deprive them of arms" - Aristotle
srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 5317
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by srothstein »

Kythas wrote:However, it's only against the law to lie to Federal law enforcement personnel. It's not illegal to lie to state/local law enforcement - unless the law's changed in the 12 years (wow, has it been that long?) since I've been a cop. Maybe he's referring to an obstruction of justice or interfering with a police investigation charge.
One of the more recent changes to filing a false police report is that it now includes lying to a police officer about something material to an investigation.
Steve Rothstein
Venus Pax
Senior Member
Posts: 3147
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: SE Texas

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by Venus Pax »

I don't think either person should be charged with shooting the burglars.

As for the other charges, they're understandable. Not only was the shooter here illegally, but he had already been deported for committing crimes when he was here previously. He needs to go away and stay away. As for the store owner, she's either incredibly stupid or lacks a conscience. Either way, she deserves all of the charges except murder or accessory (sp?) to murder.
"If a man breaks in your house, he ain't there for iced tea." Mom & Dad.

The NRA & TSRA are a bargain; they're much cheaper than the cold, dead hands experience.
User avatar
AJSully421
Senior Member
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: SW Fort Worth

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by AJSully421 »

I'm sorry, but if you're hiring illegal felons, this type of thing might happen to you. prayers all the way around, and the wheels of justice will turn.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan, 1964

30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.

NRA, LTC, School Safety, Armed Security, & Body Guard Instructor
Mr.Scott
Member
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:51 pm

Re: Hurricane Dolly Looter Shot

Post by Mr.Scott »

While the person who supplied the firearm to the felon should be charged with that crime and anything dealing with the harboring of an illegal, I do not think she should be charged with the homicide, if he was within his legal authority to use deadly force.

This boils down to, if a guy was convicted of a felony years ago, but his wife owned a gun, can he not use the gun to defend himself in his home against an intruder? I can see and support him not being able to get a CHL or able to have a weapon in his car, but if he is in his own home, he should have the right to protect himself as much as anyone else.
DIVIDED WE STAND, UNITED WE FALL
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”