51% question

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar
rtschl
Senior Member
Posts: 1468
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

51% question

Post by rtschl »

This is in a similar vein as the Bass Hall and Kimball Art Museum posts, but with a twist... I visited a family members church recently. The church leases space from The Van Cliburn Hall in Fort Worth which I found out is posted Red 51%. I didn't notice the sign on the way in (trying to catch my energetic child running in the door) but did on the way out. :banghead:

My question, since there was no alcohol being served for other events at the time at this location, does that make the 51% sign unenforceable? I know I may not have beaten the ride and concealed is concealed worked, but I didn't like thinking as I was leaving that I could have been in violation.

This aspect of 51% for a sub-contractor making an entire venue off limits needs to be a priority in being changed in the next session.

Thank you,

Edited to add it was a Red 51% sign
Ron
NRA Member
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: 51% question

Post by Keith B »

Unfortunately a 51% location is a 51% location and doesn't matter if alcohol is being served or not.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
RetNavy
Senior Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:21 am
Location: Paris, Tx

Re: 51% question

Post by RetNavy »

rtschl wrote:This is in a similar vein as the Bass Hall and Kimball Art Museum posts, but with a twist... I visited a family members church recently. The church leases space from The Van Cliburn Hall in Fort Worth which I found out is posted Red 51%. I didn't notice the sign on the way in (trying to catch my energetic child running in the door) but did on the way out. :banghead:

My question, since there was no alcohol being served for other events at the time at this location, does that make the 51% sign unenforceable? I know I may not have beaten the ride and concealed is concealed worked, but I didn't like thinking as I was leaving that I could have been in violation.

This aspect of 51% for a sub-contractor making an entire venue off limits needs to be a priority in being changed in the next session.

Thank you,

Edited to add it was a Red 51% sign


this is what i found on the TABC site

Lic. #:
ARTS AMENITIES INC.
ARTS AMENITIES INC.
817-212-4300
330 E 4TH ST
FORT WORTH, TX 76102
Trade Name:
Owner:
Location Address Mailing Address
Status:
Orig. Lic. Date:
Expiration Date:
County:
Phone No.:
Tarrant
05/03/2001
05/02/2015
MB492323
Subordinates:
Current
CB,LB,PE
Wine Percent:
Related To: Gun Sign: RED
200 E 4TH STREET
FORT WORTH, TX 76102
Lic. #:
ARTS AMENITIES INC.
ARTS AMENITIES INC.
817-212-4300
330 E 4TH ST
FORT WORTH, TX 76102
Trade Name:
Owner:
Location Address Mailing Address
Status:
Orig. Lic. Date:
Expiration Date:
County:
Phone No.:
Tarrant
03/31/1998
03/30/2015
MB428754
Subordinates:
Current
CB,LB,PE
Wine Percent:
Related To: Gun Sign: RED

this is the address for the Bass Performing Hall
"Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless coward. Freedom will be defended!"
-President George W. Bush, September 11, 2001
User avatar
C-dub
Senior Member
Posts: 13579
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: 51% question

Post by C-dub »

How in the world are these two locations legitimate 51% locations?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar
RetNavy
Senior Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:21 am
Location: Paris, Tx

Re: 51% question

Post by RetNavy »

C-dub wrote:How in the world are these two locations legitimate 51% locations?
:iagree:


having never been there my guess would be they have vendors that only sell alcohol set up and probably some law in the TABC statutes allow them to make the place a 51%. just guessing. My way of thinking is that since the hall is rented for events that is where they're are making the money, not alcohol sales. :headscratch
"Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless coward. Freedom will be defended!"
-President George W. Bush, September 11, 2001
User avatar
Keith B
Moderator
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: 51% question

Post by Keith B »

RetNavy wrote:
C-dub wrote:How in the world are these two locations legitimate 51% locations?
:iagree:


having never been there my guess would be they have vendors that only sell alcohol set up and probably some law in the TABC statutes allow them to make the place a 51%. just guessing. My way of thinking is that since the hall is rented for events that is where they're are making the money, not alcohol sales. :headscratch
That's exactly it. The company that does the concessions holds the liquor license and makes more than 51% of their revenue from alcohol sales. So, because they hold the license, then it makes the whole venue 51%.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar
rtschl
Senior Member
Posts: 1468
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: 51% question

Post by rtschl »

Thanks Keith and RetNavy. I did look it up on TABC before posting just to make sure it was a legit posting.

C-Dub, RetNavy and Keith are correct per a previous thread viewtopic.php?f=7&t=70871. It doesn't seem logical that a vendor or contractor can make an entire venue a 51%, but it is. Thus Van Cliburn, Bass Hall and Kimball Art Museum are 51% posted. That is the reason I say this must be one of the top priorities of the next legislative session.

My two cents worth:

* No government (city, county, state etc.) can have any premises posted 51%. They obviously are not in the beverage alcohol business (or shouldn't be).
* A business is not 51% unless total revenue of premises (or enclosed section thereof) is 51% or more alcohol sales. By having an enclosed section that still allows for bars inside other businesses like a hotel or a Bass Hall. Let them mark an area 51% (point of sale) but not the entire premises.

Obviously we need lawyers like Charles to lay this out in a way that would be able to make it out of committee and ultimate passage. Let's start by getting a new Speaker of the House.
Ron
NRA Member
FML
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:27 pm

Re: 51% question

Post by FML »

rtschl wrote:Thanks Keith and RetNavy. I did look it up on TABC before posting just to make sure it was a legit posting.

C-Dub, RetNavy and Keith are correct per a previous thread viewtopic.php?f=7&t=70871. It doesn't seem logical that a vendor or contractor can make an entire venue a 51%, but it is. Thus Van Cliburn, Bass Hall and Kimball Art Museum are 51% posted. That is the reason I say this must be one of the top priorities of the next legislative session.

My two cents worth:

* No government (city, county, state etc.) can have any premises posted 51%. They obviously are not in the beverage alcohol business (or shouldn't be).
* A business is not 51% unless total revenue of premises (or enclosed section thereof) is 51% or more alcohol sales. By having an enclosed section that still allows for bars inside other businesses like a hotel or a Bass Hall. Let them mark an area 51% (point of sale) but not the entire premises.

Obviously we need lawyers like Charles to lay this out in a way that would be able to make it out of committee and ultimate passage. Let's start by getting a new Speaker of the House.
It would be more simple to get rid of the 51% rule and expand the intoxication rule to include cops.
User avatar
jbarn
Senior Member
Posts: 855
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:50 am
Location: South Texas

Re: 51% question

Post by jbarn »

FML wrote:
rtschl wrote:Thanks Keith and RetNavy. I did look it up on TABC before posting just to make sure it was a legit posting.

C-Dub, RetNavy and Keith are correct per a previous thread viewtopic.php?f=7&t=70871. It doesn't seem logical that a vendor or contractor can make an entire venue a 51%, but it is. Thus Van Cliburn, Bass Hall and Kimball Art Museum are 51% posted. That is the reason I say this must be one of the top priorities of the next legislative session.

My two cents worth:

* No government (city, county, state etc.) can have any premises posted 51%. They obviously are not in the beverage alcohol business (or shouldn't be).
* A business is not 51% unless total revenue of premises (or enclosed section thereof) is 51% or more alcohol sales. By having an enclosed section that still allows for bars inside other businesses like a hotel or a Bass Hall. Let them mark an area 51% (point of sale) but not the entire premises.

Obviously we need lawyers like Charles to lay this out in a way that would be able to make it out of committee and ultimate passage. Let's start by getting a new Speaker of the House.
It would be more simple to get rid of the 51% rule and expand the intoxication rule to include cops.
Just curious.....what has that to do with this topic?
Texas CHL Instructor
Texas DPS Certified Private Security Classroom and Firearms Instructor
TCLEOSE Instructor (now TCOLE)
FML
Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:27 pm

Re: 51% question

Post by FML »

jbarn wrote:Just curious.....what has that to do with this topic?
I thought the OP moved the topic of conversation to discussing changes in the law.

If not, then I'll get back in line and agree with everyone. They are 51% locations according to TABC.
User avatar
rtschl
Senior Member
Posts: 1468
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:50 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: 51% question

Post by rtschl »

I did move the topic discussion - frustrated by Texas having Joe Strauss as Speaker of the House! :banghead: As per the previous thread on Bass Hall, HB3218 would have fixed this. :txflag:
Ron
NRA Member
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”